tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1549089718489651445.post6827915698947142102..comments2007-08-22T00:53:40.900-05:00DCScraphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06109944563728433069noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1549089718489651445.post-23999950406435127632007-08-22T00:53:00.000-05:002007-08-22T00:53:00.000-05:00ok i love animals, as much as i love humans, i mean to me they are equivalent, but yes i must agree, 1 year for killing those animals i think is to little, BUT, 90 days for a killing a human and getting excused cause u were drunk FKNING INSANE, and on top of that little gets to continue in the nfl untouched while vick may not play again?? i admit i hate vick for what he did, i really do, but what kind of world do we live in?? i mean drinking alcohol and driving has become a reason, no it has become a lifesavour for mister little, and it has taken away some kids mother, someones wife and daughter, cousin, best friend, i mean what a joke this is, the law is a joke and the nfl is a joke, btw i love football and animals, and to me this is truly ridiculous!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1549089718489651445.post-68190411473447902982007-08-21T12:13:00.000-05:002007-08-21T12:13:00.000-05:00I am not a football fan, nor had I even heard of Leonard Little or Michael Vick before keeping tabs on this dogfighting fiasco.<BR/><BR/>First of all, Little should have been imprisoned for a LONG time, not just slapped on the wrist. Vick should also be imprisoned and fined heavily for his actions.<BR/><BR/>Both crimes are horrific, be it the murder of a human or an animal. In Vick's case, it is a well-known fact that killing innocent animals, leads to violence against humans.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1549089718489651445.post-32616964971613467292007-08-20T17:11:00.000-05:002007-08-20T17:11:00.000-05:00You misunderstand "Intent". If you kill someone while driving drunk, it's not Murder unless you meant to kill that person. If you did not it's vehicular manslaughter, which is a very serious crime as well. There was no intent on Little's part to kill the woman. Her death was the result of his selfish careless actions. It is simple, without intent, you do not have murder. Little imo got off scott free and that is the true shame here. But to try and compare his situation to Vick's is pointless. One has nothing to do with the other.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1549089718489651445.post-13887555789660819782007-08-17T18:05:00.000-05:002007-08-17T18:05:00.000-05:00That argument about the difference between Little and Vick is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Little did not intentionally kill someone because he was drunk - does that excuse everything someone does when drunk?<BR/><BR/>Little made a decision to drink and drive and thus he did intentionally kill someone. <BR/><BR/>If you get drunk and force yourself on a 12 year old girl - guess what? Still rape.<BR/><BR/>You have half a bottle of whiskey, pick up a shotgun and put a hole in your brothers face - guess what? Still murder.<BR/><BR/>You get drunk, jump behind the wheel and kill someone guess what you still MURDERED someone. <BR/><BR/>Dogs have rights to - you're right. But 1 year behind bars for a crime against animals while someone who KILLED A HUMAN BEING does 90 days - that's insanity.theoriginaljdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00617207710938001790noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1549089718489651445.post-60931718152160432812007-08-17T12:15:00.000-05:002007-08-17T12:15:00.000-05:00My only advice for Vick? <BR/><BR/>Don't drop the soap. <BR/><BR/>Guilty as charged....Hoosierboynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1549089718489651445.post-66644013682057949152007-08-17T11:51:00.000-05:002007-08-17T11:51:00.000-05:00Little did not kill the woman on purpose. Vick made a conscious decision to violate the law. You are comparing apples and oranges.<BR/><BR/>I'm tired of people thinking Vick should get off just because they're dogs and not people. The bottom line is that MICHAEL VICK BROKE THE LAW and should be punished like any common citizen would be.NoDogsAreNotPeopleToonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1549089718489651445.post-53641553482515246312007-08-16T13:32:00.000-05:002007-08-16T13:32:00.000-05:00Warrick Dunn clarified his statements about Vick. I did a post about it. Wanna read it? Here it go...<BR/><BR/>http://www.leavethemanalone.com/2007/08/warrick-dunn-complains.htmlThe HCIChttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17417163486828431486noreply@blogger.com